Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 2006 Dec; 24(4): 446-55
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-953

ABSTRACT

A household survey was undertaken in Matlab, a rural area of Bangladesh, to estimate the costs incurred during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period for women delivering at home and in a health facility. Those interviewed included 121 women who delivered at home, 120 who delivered in an ICDDR,B basic obstetric care (BEOC) facility, 27 who delivered in a public comprehensive obstetric care (CEOC) hospital, and 58 who delivered in private hospitals. There was no significant difference in total costs incurred by those delivering at home and those delivering in a BEOC facility. Costs for those delivering in CEOC facilities were over nine times greater than for those delivering in BEOC facilities. Costs of care during delivery were predominant. Antenatal and postnatal care added between 7% and 30% to the total cost. Services were more equitable at home and in a BEOC facility compared to services provided at CEOC facilities. The study highlights the regressive nature of the financing of CEOC services and the need for a financing strategy that covers both the costs of referral and BEOC care for those in need.


Subject(s)
Adult , Bangladesh , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Home Childbirth/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Maternal Health Services/economics , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Salud pública Méx ; 45(1): 27-34, ene.-feb. 2003. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-333566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the costs of maternal health services in Rosario, Argentina. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The provider costs (US$ 1999) of antenatal care, a normal vaginal delivery and a caesarean section, were evaluated retrospectively in two municipal hospitals. The cost of an antenatal visit was evaluated in two health centres and the patient costs associated with the visit were evaluated in a hospital and a health centre. RESULTS: The average cost per hospital day is $114.62. The average cost of a caesarean section ($525.57) is five times greater than that of a normal vaginal delivery ($105.61). A normal delivery costs less at the general hospital and a c-section less at the maternity hospital. The average cost of an antenatal visit is $31.10. The provider cost is lower at the health centre than at the hospital. Personnel accounted for 72-94 percent of the total cost and drugs and medical supplies between 4-26 percent. On average, an antenatal visit costs women $4.70. Direct costs are minimal compared to indirect costs of travel and waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the potential for increasing the efficiency of resource use by promoting antenatal care visits at the primary level. Women could also benefit from reduced travel and waiting time. Similar benefits could accrue to the provider by encouraging normal delivery at general hospitals, and complicated deliveries at specialised maternity hospitals


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Community Health Centers/economics , Health Care Costs , Hospitals, Municipal/economics , Maternal Health Services/economics , Public Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Argentina , Cesarean Section/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Direct Service Costs , Hospital Costs , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Prenatal Care/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL